We need the beautiful elements of the Lukan story,
the angel choir, and the wondrous birth. But we need them
to be kept in tension by the human struggles of the
story's participants.
There was a knock at the door.
When I answered it, there stood Fritz (names have been
changed in this article), a Vietnam veteran, shivering in
a threadbare old coat.
"You got any food?" he asked.
I handed him one of the bags we kept there in the
hallway of the parish house for such emergencies. He
checked through the contents, then handed me back the box
of dry elbow macaroni.
"You still sleeping in that shed behind someone's
house?" I asked, "unbeknownst to them?"
"Yup."
"With nowhere to cook?"
"Yup."
"These cold nights, you could go over to the
shelter at Peace Church, you know. They have sandwiches,
coffee, cookies, sleeping mats, blankets, clean clothes,
music...."
"Sometimes I do, but being around a lot of people
like that can make me pretty shaky. Well, thanks."
He turned and was gone.
I went back upstairs to continue working on the sermon
for Christmas Eve. The text was the familiar Christmas
story, Luke 2:1-20. Everyone already knew it by heart.
What could I say that would make it freshly meaningful?
As I looked out the window, I saw a very pregnant
teenager walking by, pushing a little two-year-old boy in
a stroller. When Abby's mother had discovered her
condition, she had kicked her out of the house. Abby had
wandered the aging Chicago neighborhood, sleeping in
entryways, until she finally found a single mother who
needed someone to care for her son while she worked. She
invited Abby to move in, and the arrangement was
apparently working out for both of them.
But would she be allowed to stay on after her own
child was born? If not, where would she go?
A Rereading
I reread the Luke passage, the account of a young
woman named Mary who was pregnant without being married.
What had her parents said when they found out? Is that
one of the reasons she made such a quick trip up to the
hill country to visit her relative Elizabeth, and stayed
there three months? According to the law, she could have
been put to death by stoning.
What about Joseph? Into my mind came a picture of
Merit, the young man with cerebral palsy who had dropped
by and worshiped with us the previous Sunday. He had
struggled to make his way down the aisle on crutches.
Struggled to stand up and sing. Struggled to tell me
after the service that he'd been living with his sister,
but now she was getting married, and he had to move into
a group home, which didn't feel comfortable. So he spent
most of his time wandering the streetswhere passersby,
thinking he was drunk, laughed at him.
When Joseph learned about Mary's situation, he had
wanted to dismiss her quietlyuntil an angel told him to
stay with her. What did her claims as to who was the
other parent of the child do for his standing in the
community? Did the men of Nazareth laugh at him, "Oh
sure, Joseph, sure, it was the Holy Spirit. We all know
that!"
What about Jesus? Did the mothers of the other kids in
the neighborhood warn them not to play with this little
boy who'd been born out of wedlock? Was he ever accepted
on the sandlot?
And what about the place where Jesus was born, a cave
used as a barnhow much more homeless could Mary,
Joseph, and Jesus have been?
And what about the shepherds, the lowest people on the
social ladder of that day? Smelly, dirty (how could they
be otherwise, working day and night with sheep?), looked
down on by everyone, not fit to come into polite society.
Then and Now
These were the characters of the Lukan drama:
homeless, outcast, ridiculed, pregnant without benefit of
marriage, born to an unwed teenager, and looked down upon
by "good" people.
Not too different from the street people around the
church where I worked: the homeless man who slept in a
pile of old rags, haunted by his memories of a war; the
pregnant teenager booted out of her home; the young man
with cerebral palsy who'd never be able to live a usual
life.
What about the people of our own congregation? Though
they all may have a roof over their heads, how many are,
in a way, homeless? How many are living in homes
shattered by desertion, divorce, violence, or death? By
anger, selfishness, vindictiveness? By mental illness,
drunkenness, obsessive gambling, drugs, unfaithfulness,
or trouble with the law?
And how many in our congregation are looked down on
for physical disabilities, or for their race, class,
gender, sexual orientation, and age?
And how many are hungry
starved, evenfor acceptance, forgiveness,
understanding, and even a little human kindness?
Three Levels
The Christmas story seems to have three levels: the
folk around the manger, our street people, and the
members of our congregation.
The Christmas narrative is not just sweetness and
lighta contented baby, a demure mother, a wise and
supportive father, angels with heavenly voices, amazed
shepherdseven though sometimes we have tended to
describe it that way.
It is about people who were hurting, even the people
in the makeshift stable.
And it is about a Lord who stooped as low as possible
to gather all into his loving care. No one was too lowly,
broken, homeless or hungry, looked down upon or forsaken,
to be sought out by him.
| Christmas cannot be
understood apart from the darkness of the world. |
|
The Essential Tension
The Swedish theologian Gustaf Aulen1 liked
to remind us that all things in the Christian life need
to be held in an essential tension. God's love keeps
God's justice from becoming too harsh; God's justice
keeps God's love from becoming too sticky and
sentimental.
We need the beautiful elements of the Lukan story, the
angel choir, and the wondrous birth. But we need them to
be kept in tension by the human struggles of the story's
participants. And these, in turn, need to be kept in
tension by the stories of our street people and by our
own story as a congregation.
It's not just the folk of Naphtali and Zebulun who
live in a land of deep darkness; we all are the people of
Isaiah 9. We are the homeless, the hungry, and the
abandoned. To paraphrase St. Augustine, "You have
created us to live with you in your kingdom, O Lord, and
we are homeless until we find our home with you. You have
created us with a great hunger for you, and we will not
be satisfied until we feast at your table. You have
created us to be your beloved children, and we feel
orphaned until we hear you call us your delighted-in sons
and daughters."
But, sadly, we are also those who pass by and ignore
the hungry, the homeless, and the abandoned. C. G. Jung2
said that society is the sum total of individuals in need
of redemption. That's us.
In Gravity and Grace, Joseph Sittler asks how
it is possible that all down through the ages the figure
of the crucified one upon the cross has been the center
of devotional gravity, the center of human pain and
torment.3 The answer, he believes, is that
unless the Lord takes the tormented shape of our human
existence, he isn't Lord enough.
To be the source of our order, he must become the
horror of our disorder.
Christmas cannot be understood apart from this world's
darkness. Only then can the coming of the Light be Good
News.
Barbara Jurgensen
is a
retired pastor and professor at Trinity Lutheran
Seminary, Columbus, Ohio, and a writer.
Endnotes
1. Gustaf Aulen, The Faith of the Christian Church
(Philadelphia: Fortress, 1960).
2. C.G. Jung, The Undiscovered Self (New
York: New American Library, 1958), p. 68.
3. Joseph Sittler, Gravity and Grace: Reflections
and Provocations (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1986), p.
34.
|