|
|
Issue Paper: Global Warming and
Climate Change
Caring for Creation: Global Warming and Climate Change
NOVEMBER 2003
RECOMMENDED by the Advisory Committee
on Corporate Social Responsibility, September 6, 2003.
ENDORSED by the Board of the Division for Church in Society,
October 24, 2003
APPROVED by the Church Council
November 2003
Background
The earth is a planet of beauty and abundance; the earth system is
wonderfully intricate and incredibly complex. But today living
creatures, and the air, soil and water that support them, face
unprecedented threats. Many threats are global: most stem directly from
human activity (“Caring for Creation,” 2.B-1).
[1] As Christians, we understand human beings as fundamentally
responsible before God. With the reach of our contemporary human
knowledge and the power we employ in new technologies, this
responsibility in terms of caring for creation now includes the global
future itself. Central to that question is the threat posed by global
warming and climate change.
These threats and changes have been summarized in the mostrecent
findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2001
Report (Summary for Policymakers, A Report of Working Group I of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change),
[2] which concludes that there is an increasing body of
observations that gives a collective picture of a warming world and
other changes in the climate system. Examples include rising surface
temperatures, snow and ice melts, rising sea levels, and changes in
weather patterns, such as drought, flooding, and monsoons. The spring
2003 US Environmental Protection Agency Web site, “Global Warming –
Climate,”
[3] uses this IPPC report in their climate model presentation.
Consensus is emerging among scientists that most of the observed change
is due to an increase in greenhouse gas concentrations caused by fossil
fuel combustion and other human activity (The New Business Climate: A
Guide to Lower Carbon Emissions and Better Business Performance, by Joel
N. Swisher, (Rocky Mountain Institute, 2002).
[4]
In April of 2002, CERES published a report, Value at Risk: Climate
Change and the Future of Governance, prepared by Innovest Strategic
Value Advisors, Inc.
[5] This was followed in 2003 with Innovest Strategic Advisors
releasing Carbon Disclosure Project: Carbon Finance and the Global
Equity Markets.
[6] In July of 2003, a report was prepared and released by the
Investor Responsibility Research Center (IRRC), Corporate Governance and
Climate Change: Making the Connection.
[7] These reports summarized the key factors that are converging
calling for companies to move this issue to a prominent place on their
agendas. These not only include the scientific consensus mentioned
above, but review the recent reports of mainstream financial
institutions (Swiss Re, Credit Suisse, and Deutsche Bank), which make
the case that the growing cost of continued corporate inaction will
outweigh the cost of action. They also indicate that the sooner positive
actions are taken, the greater the economic benefits for a company. The
report from IRRC identifies problem areas in corporate governance
related to global warming. In addition, there is a move to an
increasingly aggressive action by international governments. Many have
ratified the Kyoto
Protocol,
[8] while others are in the process of establishing concrete
national emissions abatement plans. Multinational corporations find
themselves in a position of having to implement these provisions in
their plants within the next decade. States in this country are enacting
their own legislation to control greenhouse gases. California passed a
law in 2002 to control CO2 emissions from the auto sector. New Hampshire
and Massachusetts have adopted legislation to control electric utility
CO2 emissions.
ELCA Social Policy
“Caring for Creation: Vision, Hope, and Justice” (ELCA, 1993): The
social statement develops this church’s vision of creation, while
showing us the gift of hope. It calls us to justice through principles
of participation, solidarity, sufficiency, and sustainability.
Specifically this social statement calls the church to engage in
dialogue with corporations on how to promote justice for creation
(5.E.1-1). This includes dialogues around implementing comprehensive
environmental principles, healthy environments, and cooperation between
the public and private sector regarding sustainability.
In addition, the Churchwide Assembly in 2001 reaffirmed the
commitment of this church to the care of creation, including global
warming, as part of the web of complex interwoven environmental concerns
(Assembly Action CA01.07.57).
Corporate Response
In preparing to respond to state-level greenhouse gas regulation
legislation and UN treaties, companies need to begin to invest time and
resources in three major areas (The New Business Climate: A Guide to
Lower Carbon Emissions and Better Business Performance [see footnote
4]):
- Participating in carbon offset trading programs;
[9]
- Implementing advanced technologies; and
- Reorienting company strategies toward new processes, products and
services.
It is reasonable for a company to begin this work by evaluating and
reporting on their greenhouse gas emissions and total “footprint” (how
much does their product emit, how their delivery process operates, who
their suppliers are) and by setting targets for decreasing their
emissions. In addition, the company can review their probable risk
exposure to financial and competitive consequences of climate change.
They can ensure that they have sufficient expertise to make informed and
responsible decisions and benchmark themselves within their own industry
sector. Climate change strategies and strategic alliances can be built
into an overall business plan thus preparing the company for success in
the future.
Shareholder Work History
For over ten years, the community of faith-based shareholders (mainly
through the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility) has been
urging companies to report on research and actions they are taking to
address global warming. In the past two years, a combined working group
of environmental specialists, the faith community, and other socially
responsible investors have pushed the campaign to new levels. In 2003,
twenty-eight global warming resolutions were filed with a variety of
companies. These resolutions received results in the 20–39 percent range
of the shareholder vote. In addition, many dialogues are ongoing. The
campaign divided its work into four industry sectors: oil and gas,
utilities, transportation, and appliances.
ELCA has had resolutions and done work in this area beginning in
1995. Since 2001, the ELCA has taken a leadership role in the appliance
sector work. Our dialogue has been fruitful, with the companies
gathering data and beginning to report on their greenhouse gas
footprint. Our work in this area in recent times has been based on the
2000 report Appliances and Global Climate Change: Increasing Consumer
Participation in Reducing Greenhouse Gases, prepared for the Pew Center
on Global Climate Change.
[10]
Resolution Guidelines for ELCA
| |
We support reports on greenhouse gas footprints,
as well as the establishments of targets for their reduction.
We support disclosure of the economic risks
associated with past, present, and future emissions. o We support
reports on economic benefits of committing to a substantial
reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and a reduction of product
emissions.
We support reports on public policies that enable
and assist achievement of these emission targets.
We support reports on economic risks associated
with exposure to the myriad pending and adopted legislation from
state, regional, and international bodies as it relates to reduction
of greenhouse gases.
|
| [1]
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. Caring for Creation: Vision,
Hope, and Justice. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress Publishers,
1993.
http://www.elca.org/socialstatements/environment/
[2] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change
2001: Synthesis Report. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press,
2001.
http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/
[3] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Global
Warming-Climate. USA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency website,
2003.
http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwarming.nsf/content/
ClimateFutureClimateUSClimate.html
[4] Swisher, Joel N. The New Business Climate: A Guide to
Lower Carbon Emissions and Better Business Performance. Snowmass,
CO: Rocky Mountain Institute, 2002.
[5] Innovest Strategic Value Advisors, Inc. Value at Risk:
Climate Change and the Future of Governance. Boston, MA: Coalition
for Environmentally Responsible Economies, 2002.
http://innovestgroup.com/
[6] Innovest Strategic Value Advisors, Inc. Carbon Disclosure
Project: Carbon Finance and the Global Equity Markets. Richmond
Hill, Ontario: Innovest Strategic Value Advisors, Inc., 2003.
http://innovestgroup.com/
[7] Cogan, Douglas G. Corporate Governance and Climate
Change: Making the Connection. Boston, MA: Coalition for
Environmentally Responsible Economies, 2003.
[8] United Nations. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change. Kyoto, Japan: United
Nations, 1997.
http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.html
[9] see footnote 4. [10] Shorey, Everett, Shorey
Consulting, Inc., Eckman, Tom, Northwest Power Planning Counsel.
Appliances and Global Climate Change: Increasing Consumer
Participation in Reducing Greenhouse Gases. Arlington, VA: Pew
Center on Global Climate Change, 2000.
http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/appliances.pdf
|
|
 |
 |